![]() Perceiving each figure detached from a background, and more, perceiving them in movement, floating or sliding, distancing relatively to each other, gives ironically the sensation of flatness and strangeness. Indeed, each figure seems like cut out so that the S3D is in the end just a more or less progressive jump between layers. To separate the picture elements on different virtual panels is giving this sensation of pop-up books or Puppet Theater evolving on different stage set levels. On a semiotic level the image as a full icon and as a full world, unity or “reality” is not anymore. To resume, with S3D you are strictly immersed on a sensational side by relating to the spatial effect, it’s a fact, but on a sensitive and cognitive side, you are not relating to the image as it was before. In fact, the cinema industry, by thinking only in terms of spatial immersion of the spectator, wishing the image to get out of its medium to surround and reach the viewers’ body, forgot not only the image qualities as such but also that the image is already a total visual experience. ![]() ![]() One of the most relevant undesired effects is the layered aspect of the picture which is destroying the image as a whole. The stereoscopic 3D is definitely dealing with problems involved by its technical process to the point of creating a paradox that still need to be explained.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |